In an asynchronous course, grading and feedback are key ways students experience teacher presence. Clear grading builds trust and structure, while meaningful feedback guides students toward improvement and reinforces that their effort is noticed.
When grading practices are predictable and clearly communicated, students are better able to manage their pacing, understand expectations, and get help when they need it. As you review these guidelines, keep in mind that each one supports accurate progress monitoring and meaningful student intervention throughout the term.
All work must be graded within 48 hours of submission. Timely grading helps students know where they stand and what to do next. In an asynchronous class, feedback replaces real-time check-ins, so quick turnaround is essential for pacing, motivation, and preventing students from falling behind.
Students must submit all work through CTLS. Work should never be accepted via email, nor should assignments be submitted as OneDrive or Google links. Requiring submissions in CTLS keeps grades accurate, ensures feedback is documented, and allows student support systems to function properly.
All coursework must be flagged as Missing the day after the due date. Marking work as missing keeps student grades accurate in real time and automatically triggers support and intervention systems throughout the term. Delaying this step can prevent students from getting help when they need it most.
Students, families, and support staff need current grades to understand how a student is doing.
Timely feedback helps students revise their thinking, improve their work, and stay connected to the course.
Consistent grading and missing-work flags help intervention systems identify students who need support.
Clear grading practices help students understand expectations, stay on pace, and receive the support they need before they fall too far behind.